Skip to main content

Table 3 Study characteristics for studies on guideline adherence

From: The effect of computerized decision support systems on cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Superiority/ Non-inferiority

Inclusion period

Follow up

Guideline adhered

Country

Type of practice

Goud et.al, 2009 [87]

Superiority

Jan 2005 - Dec 2005

12 months

Cardiac rehabilitation

The Netherlands

Rehabilitation center

Holbrook et.al, 2011 [88]

NR

April 2003–June 2005

12 months

NR

Canada

PCP

Mazzaglia et.al, 2016 [89]

Superiority

NR

12 months

ESC

Italy

PCP

Schnipper et.al, 2010 [90]

NR

March 2007 - Aug 2007

30 days

NR

USA

PCP

Sequist et.al, 2005 [91]

NR

Oct 2002 – April 2003

6 months

ADA/AHA

USA

PCP

  1. NR not reported, RCT randomized controlled trial, PCP primary care practice, USA United States of America, L low risk of bias, U unknown risk of bias, H high risk of bias, ESC European Society of Cardiology, AHA American Heart Association, ADA American Diabetes Association