Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Study characteristics for studies on guideline adherence

From: The effect of computerized decision support systems on cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author Superiority/ Non-inferiority Inclusion period Follow up Guideline adhered Country Type of practice
Goud et.al, 2009 [87] Superiority Jan 2005 - Dec 2005 12 months Cardiac rehabilitation The Netherlands Rehabilitation center
Holbrook et.al, 2011 [88] NR April 2003–June 2005 12 months NR Canada PCP
Mazzaglia et.al, 2016 [89] Superiority NR 12 months ESC Italy PCP
Schnipper et.al, 2010 [90] NR March 2007 - Aug 2007 30 days NR USA PCP
Sequist et.al, 2005 [91] NR Oct 2002 – April 2003 6 months ADA/AHA USA PCP
  1. NR not reported, RCT randomized controlled trial, PCP primary care practice, USA United States of America, L low risk of bias, U unknown risk of bias, H high risk of bias, ESC European Society of Cardiology, AHA American Heart Association, ADA American Diabetes Association