Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A retrospective comparison of inappropriate prescribing of psychotropics in three Norwegian nursing homes in 2000 and 2016 with prescribing quality indicators

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 May 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Erin Barnett
9 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
14 Nov 2018 Author responded Author comments - Jan Schjøtt
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Nov 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Erin Barnett
4 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
3 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kjell H. Halvorsen
8 Apr 2019 Author responded Author comments - Jan Schjøtt
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Apr 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Erin Barnett
12 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kjell H. Halvorsen
26 Apr 2019 Author responded Author comments - Jan Schjøtt
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Apr 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
14 May 2019 Editorially accepted
29 May 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12911-019-0821-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement