Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Improving health information systems during an emergency: lessons and recommendations from an Ebola treatment centre in Sierra Leone

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Jun 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Shefali Oza
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eric Perakslis
20 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Laura Nic Lochlainn
21 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Abigail Carlson
29 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sylvain DeLisle
4 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Cummings
21 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Shefali Oza
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sylvain DeLisle
11 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Cummings
4 Mar 2019 Author responded Author comments - Shefali Oza
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Mar 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 Mar 2019 Author responded Author comments - Shefali Oza
Resubmission - Version 5
20 Mar 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
13 Apr 2019 Author responded Author comments - Shefali Oza
Resubmission - Version 6
13 Apr 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
16 Apr 2019 Editorially accepted
27 May 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12911-019-0817-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement