|
SUS scores > = 68 (i.e. rated usability as above average)
|
|
We should have 3 risk choices (as it is for Cochrane review): low, unclear and high risk, and not only low versus unclear/high.
|
97.5
|
|
think the suggested text is good, so long as it doesn’t make people lazy.
|
92.5
|
|
The two blinding questions are confusing because the form did not specify which outcome that I am supposed to assess.
|
90
|
|
I had a hard time finding the green highlighted information\dots this colour was hard for me to see
|
87.5
|
|
I think it would be helpful to have a pop-up window that would have the explanation for each of the risk of bias questions.
|
77.5
|
|
SUS scores < 68 (i.e. rated usability as below average)
|
|
Technical problems with highlighting occurred.
|
67.5
|
|
Risk that reviewers would only focus on suggested text, not full text.
|
65
|
|
What was the order of the annotated text when multiple pieces of text were highlighted? Is it sorted by text order or relevance? I hope it’s by relevance!
|
57.5
|
|
The text suggestions usually had at least one relevant sentence (maybe 1 out of 3) for rating so it meant I was unclicking things to be accurate.
|
57.5
|
|
I found myself searching for an “undo” button when I deleted a suggested text spot, then changed my mind.
|
55
|
