Talking about treatment benefits, harms, and what matters to patients in radiation oncology: an observational study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 Oct 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Olson|
|1 Jun 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Timothy Showalter|
|8 Sep 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2|
|13 Nov 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Laurie Pilote|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Nov 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Feb 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2|
|21 Feb 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Laurie Pilote|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Feb 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Mar 2019||Editorially accepted|
|11 Apr 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12911-019-0800-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.