Skip to main content

Table 3 Weight and prioritization of indicators and sub-indicators using FAHP

From: Construction and application of service quality evaluation system in the preclinical research on cardiovascular implant devices

Primary indicators

Weight of Primary indicators

Sub-indicators

Weight of sub-indicators

Priority

Professionalism

0.6692

Brand imagine C11

0.0276

7

Personnel’s technical ability C12

0.2921

1

Facility and equipment attractiveness C13

0.2378

2

Professional service procedures C14

0.0882

4

Functionality

0.0958

Integrity of project completion C21

0.0235

9

Sufficiency of project completion C22

0.016

12

Reasonable interactive communication mechanism C23

0.0085

14

Project compliance C24

0.0713

5

Stability

0.0596

Service continuity C31

0.0189

10

Service stability C32

0.0346

6

Research report timely submission rate C33

0.0061

15

Security

0.1754

Permission suitability C41

0.0112

13

Information and resource readiness C42

0.0162

11

Data auditability C43

0.1208

3

Data confidentiality capability of service supplier C44

0.0272

8

Total

1.0

 

1.0

Â