Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 4 Performance of CRF and BiLSTM-CRF on CWS and POS tagging for clinical text on our corpus

From: A fine-grained Chinese word segmentation and part-of-speech tagging corpus for clinical text

Task Method P(%) R(%) F(%)
CWS CRF 96.75 97.14 96.94
BiLSTM-CRF 96.56 96.66 96.61
CWS&POS tagging CWS CRF 97.18 96.73 96.95
BiLSTM-CRF 96.86 96.76 96.81
POS tagging CRF 95.34 94.89 95.11
BiLSTM-CRF 94.81 94.72 94.77