Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Clinical decision support system for the management of osteoporosis compared to NOGG guidelines and an osteology specialist: a validation pilot study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Oct 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Haukur Tyr Gudmundsson
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 May 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John T. Schousboe
29 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
21 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Haukur Tyr Gudmundsson
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
23 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Haukur Tyr Gudmundsson
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
25 Jan 2019 Editorially accepted
1 Feb 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12911-019-0749-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement