Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Detecting change in comparison to peers in NHS prescribing data: a novel application of cumulative sum methodology

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Jun 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jiang Bian
28 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Guilherme Del Fiol
22 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Alex Walker
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Guilherme Del Fiol
12 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jiang Bian
26 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Alex Walker
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Harry Burke
9 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Caroline Crawford
22 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Alex Walker
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
24 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Alex Walker
Resubmission - Version 5
24 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
20 Jun 2018 Editorially accepted
9 Jul 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12911-018-0642-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement