Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Healthcare information systems: the cognitive challenge

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
8 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Felicity Callard
17 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karen Dunn Lopez
8 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gavan Lintern
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Felicity Callard
7 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karen Dunn Lopez
17 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gavan Lintern
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karen Dunn Lopez
17 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gavan Lintern
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
2 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
11 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12911-018-0584-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement