Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: EsPRit: ethics committee proposals for Long Term Medical Data Registries in rapidly evolving research fields - a future-proof best practice approach

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
31 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Barbara Pierscionek
6 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul DeMuro
7 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Stefan Oberbichler
Resubmission - Version 2
7 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Stefan Oberbichler
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Stefan Oberbichler
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Stefan Oberbichler
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
12 Sep 2017 Editorially accepted
18 Oct 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12911-017-0539-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement