Skip to main content

Table 4 Sensitivity, precision and F scores by virus, balancing method and feature selection

From: Enhancement of hepatitis virus immunoassay outcome predictions in imbalanced routine pathology data by data balancing and feature selection before the application of support vector machines

HBV mean (95% CI)

SMOTE

SMOTE RF

Downsize

Downsize RF

MDS

MDS RF

 Fscore

0.056 (0.054, 0.057)

0.052 (0.050, 0.053)

0.056 (0.054, 0.057)

0.052 (0.050, 0.053)

0.065 (0.061 0.068)

0.059 (0.055, 0.063)

 Precision

0.034 (0.032, 0.036)

0.026 (0.025, 0.027)

0.029 (0.028, 0.030)

0.027 (0.026, 0.028)

0.034 (0.032, 0.036)

0.031 (0.029 0.032)

 Sensitivity

0.625 (0.605, 0.645)

0.611 (0.587, 0.634)

0.625 (0.605, 0.645)

0.611 (0.587, 0.634)

0.246 (0.231, 0.260)

0.675 (0.654, 0.680)

HCV mean (95% CI)

SMOTE

SMOTE RF

Downsize

Downsize RF

MDS

MDS RF

 Fscore

0.187 (0.179, 0.196)

0.200 (0.196, 0.202)

0.174 (0.170, 0.178)

0.208 (0.200, 0.215)

0.192 (0.190, 0.195)

0.225 (0.220, 0.229)

 Precision

0.134 (0.128, 0.140)

0.117 (0.115, 0.119)

0.103 (0.100, 0.105)

0.124 (0.20, 0.129)

0.115 (0.113, 0.117)

0.138 (0.134, 0.141)

 Sensitivity

0.311 (0.296, 0.326)

0.668 (0.654, 0.682)

0.567 (0.545, 0.590)

0.625 (0.600, 0.650)

0.589 (0.579, 0.598)

0.610 (0.596, 0.623)

  1. Downsize simple downsizing, Downsize RF Simple downsizing with random forest variable selection, MDS Multiple downsizing, MDS RF MDS with random forest variable selection, SMOTE Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique, SMOTE RF SMOTE with random forest variable selection, HBV Hepatitis B virus, HCV Hepatitis C virus