Skip to main content

Table 10 Summary of findings regarding Hypotheses

From: Electronic Health Record Portal Adoption: a cross country analysis

Path Beta t-value Hypothesis Result
PE → BI 0.285 6.61** H1 supported
EE → BI 0.160 3.17** H2 supported
SI → BI 0.198 5.42** H3 supported
FC → BI 0.062 1.51 H4(a) not supported
FC → UB 0.052 1.19 H4(b) not supported
HM → BI −0.141 3.63** H5 supported
PV → BI 0.152 3.62** H6(a) supported
(PVUS → BIUS) - (PVPT → BIPT) 0.200 2.46* H6(b) supported
HT → BI 0.255 6.74** H7(a) supported
HT → UB 0.145 2.96** H7(b) supported
BI→ UB 0.480 10.57** H8 supported
CL→ UB 0.088 1.49 H9(a) not supported
(CLUS → UBUS) - (CLPT → UBPT) −0.046 0.56 H9(b) not supported
ER→ UB −0.018 0.36 H10(a) not supported
(ERUS → UBUS) - (ERPT → UBPT) 0.289 2.50* H10(b) not supported
UA→ UB −0.098 1.47 H11(a) not supported
(UAUS → UBUS) - (UAPT → UBPT) 0.149 1.03 H11(b) not supported
SU→ UB 0.000 0.00 H12(a) not supported
(SUUS → UBUS) - (SUPT → UBPT) −0.025 0.22 H12(b) not supported
  1. PE: Performance expectancy, EE: Effort expectancy, SI: Social influence, FC: Facilitating conditions, HM: Hedonic motivation, PV: Price value, HT: Habit, BI: Behavioural intention, CL: Collection, ER: Errors, UA: Unauthorized access, SU: Secondary use, UB: Use behaviour
  2. ** = P < 0.01; * = P < 0.05