Health care professionals’ attitudes towards evidence-based medicine in the workers’ compensation setting: a cohort study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|11 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|12 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kerryn Butler-Henderson|
|30 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bernard KAMSU-FOGUEM|
|8 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Loewen|
|21 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Nieke A Elbers|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bernard KAMSU-FOGUEM|
|7 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Loewen|
|8 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Nieke A Elbers|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|22 May 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12911-017-0460-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.