Skip to main content

Table 2 Analogue prediction results with dew point

From: Predicting influenza with dynamical methods

State l v Peak RMS % Error AUC RMS % Error Correlation Coefficient
AL 7 2 11.8 10.7 .83
AK 7 2 5.3 13.0 .73
AR 7 2 14.0 7.3 .66
AZ 7 2 11.0 13.9 .91
CA 7 2 5.1 19.4 .85
CO 7 2 7.1 5.1 .75
CT 7 2 9.4 8.3 .73
DE 7 2 13.7 19.8 .75
FL 7 2 14.7 7.0 .85
GA 7 2 13.0 12.0 .91
HI 7 2 9.1 7.7 .60
IL 7 2 10.5 13.8 .62
KS 7 2 8.9 9.3 .81
KY 7 2 12.3 12.7 .88
LA 7 2 9.5 10.4 .88
MD 7 2 14.6 10.7 .78
MA 7 2 11.9 10.1 .72
MS 7 2 6.8 13.7 .76
MO 7 2 10.2 5.1 .83
MT 7 2 6.5 15.8 .66
NE 7 2 15.1 11.4 .78
NV 7 2 5.3 12.9 .91
NH 7 2 22.1 6.6 .62
NJ 7 2 4.4 19.6 .67
NM 7 2 10.9 12.5 .87
NY 7 2 15.6 8.4 .80
NC 7 2 19.6 18.9 .88
ND 7 2 15.8 7.4 .72
OH 7 2 17.7 12.4 .85
OK 7 2 20.1 10.8 .69
PA 7 2 6.7 12.3 .85
RI 7 2 22.8 12.8 .65
SC 7 2 20.5 15.2 .78
SD 7 2 19.4 32.5 .62
TN 7 2 5.9 8.3 .83
TX 7 2 16.3 7.3 .86
UT 7 2 10.7 2.8 .78
VA 7 2 16.9 21.1 .71
WA 7 2 8.0 21.8 .83
WY 7 2 12.2 7.6 .76
Average for all states with l = 7,v = 2 12.3 12.2 .77