Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: How to improve vital sign data quality for use in clinical decision support systems? A qualitative study in nine Swedish emergency departments

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Sep 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Nov 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mirza Baig
10 Dec 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nicola Mackintosh
9 Jan 2016 Author responded Author comments - Niclas Skyttberg
Resubmission - Version 2
9 Jan 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Jan 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nicola Mackintosh
17 Apr 2016 Author responded Author comments - Niclas Skyttberg
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Apr 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Apr 2016 Author responded Author comments - Niclas Skyttberg
Resubmission - Version 4
29 Apr 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
19 May 2016 Author responded Author comments - Niclas Skyttberg
Resubmission - Version 5
19 May 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 5
25 May 2016 Author responded Author comments - Niclas Skyttberg
Resubmission - Version 6
25 May 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
1 Jun 2016 Editorially accepted
4 Jun 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12911-016-0305-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement