Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: An empirical study of mHealth adoption in a developing country: the moderating effect of gender concern

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Jun 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
29 Apr 2016 Editorially accepted
3 May 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12911-016-0289-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement