Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Critical factors influencing physicians’ intention to use computerized clinical practice guidelines: an integrative model of activity theory and the technology acceptance model

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Aug 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Sep 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alan Taylor
11 Sep 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jos Aarts
13 Sep 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paolo Fraccaro
17 Sep 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jacques Bouaud
24 Sep 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sarah Lillie
15 Nov 2015 Author responded Author comments - Maria Faurholt-Jepsen
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Nov 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Dec 2015 Author responded Author comments - Maria Faurholt-Jepsen
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Dec 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Dec 2015 Author responded Author comments - Maria Faurholt-Jepsen
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Dec 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
8 Jan 2016 Editorially accepted
16 Jan 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12911-016-0241-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement