Skip to main content

Table 4 Patients’ rating of feasibility of clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO

From: Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home

  

Agreement (%)

  

Clinic-ePRO

Home-ePRO

N = 113

N = 45

Did you have any difficulties completing the questionnaire?

not at all

82.3

97.8

a little

14.2

2.2

quite a bit

3.5

0.0

Did you have any difficulties handling the electronic device?

not at all

92.8

88.9

a little

3.6

8.9

quite a bit

2.7

2.2

very much

0.9

0.0

Did you have any difficulties starting the app or entering your login data?b

not at all

-

72.7

a little

27.3

How satisfied are you with the presentation of the questionnaire on the screen?

very much

91.0

95.5

quite a bit

5.4

2.3

not at all

3.6

2.3

How satisfied are you with the privacy during questionnaire completion?a

very much

86.6

-

quite a bit

6.2

a little

2.7

not at all

4.5

  

Agreement (%)

  

Clinic-ePRO

Home-ePRO

N = 113

N = 45

perceived advantages

no personal contact needed

11.0

6.7

no drive to the hospital neededb

-

42.2

availability of questionnaire at any time

58.9

44.4

low cost

31.5

24.4

feeling of being well cared for at homeb

-

57.8

perceived disadvantages

handling of the internet is so difficult

0.0

1.4

the technical requirements are too extensive

1.4

2.2

does not come up to my individual situation

30.1

8.9

too complex/confusing

2.7

0.0

too impersonal

57.5

13.3

Overall, how satisfied are you with electronic quality of life assessment at home?b

Ø (SD, range)

9.1 (1.14, 5–10)

  1. aN = 113 patients at the Medical University of Innsbruck
  2. bN = 45 patients at the Kufstein County Hospital