Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Frequency of explanation required per format for entire sample (n = 106)*.

From: How should risk be communicated to children: a cross-sectional study comparing different formats of probability information

  Frequency of explanation (%) Relationship to performance
Verbal label 48 U = 1346.00, p = .67, r = -0.04
Percentage 6 U = 234.50, p = .28, r = -0.10
Proportion-word 27 U = 1017.50, p = .46, r = -0.07
Proportion-notation 36 U = 1133.00, p = .26, r = -0.11
Pie chart 16 U = 735.50, p = .78, r = -0.03
  1. * With the exception of percentage in which N = 105