Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparative performance of two classifiers

From: A new methodology for assessment of the performance of heartbeat classification systems

 

Chazal et al.

Melo et al.

R(α N)

2.05

1.67

R(α SVEB)

65.46

17.91

R(α VEB)

0.07

0.03

R(α F)

1.79

0.71

R ( α k ) = ∑ j = 1 n λ ( α k | ω j ) P ( ω j | α k ) . MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaagaart1ev2aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xI8qiVKYPFjYdHaVhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9vqFj0dXdbba91qpepeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaGaemOuaiLaeiikaGccciGae8xSde2aaSbaaSqaaiabdUgaRbqabaGccqGGPaqkcqGH9aqpdaaeWbqaaiab=T7aSjabcIcaOiab=f7aHnaaBaaaleaacqWGRbWAaeqaaOGaeiiFaWNae8xYdC3aaSbaaSqaaiabdQgaQbqabaGccqGGPaqkcqWGqbaucqGGOaakcqWFjpWDdaWgaaWcbaGaemOAaOgabeaakiabcYha8jab=f7aHnaaBaaaleaacqWGRbWAaeqaaOGaeiykaKcaleaacqWGQbGAcqGH9aqpcqaIXaqmaeaacqWGUbGBa0GaeyyeIuoakiabc6caUaaa@5179@

6.67

1.71

R ^ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaagaart1ev2aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaWenfgDOvwBHrxAJfwnHbqeg0uy0HwzTfgDPnwy1aaceaGaf83gHiLbaKaaaaa@36B3@

0.126

0.033