Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: A systematic meta-review

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Jan 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Anneke Leijntje Francke
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Anneke Leijntje Francke
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Apr 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jako Burgers
5 Jul 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Watt
4 Aug 2008 Author responded Author comments - Anneke Leijntje Francke
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Aug 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
21 Aug 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jako Burgers
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
12 Sep 2008 Editorially accepted
12 Sep 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-8-38

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement