Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Laypersons' understanding of relative risk reductions: Randomised cross-sectional study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Feb 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Mar 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wilma Otten
26 Apr 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Murray
9 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nananda Col
15 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Danielle Timmermans
30 Aug 2007 Author responded Author comments - Lene Sorensen
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Aug 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Sep 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Murray
25 Oct 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wilma Otten
4 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Danielle Timmermans
26 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Lene Sorensen
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Apr 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Murray
29 Apr 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Danielle Timmermans
8 Jul 2008 Author responded Author comments - Lene Sorensen
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Jul 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
17 Jul 2008 Editorially accepted
17 Jul 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-8-31

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement