Skip to main content

Table 5 Association between concordance or difference of initial and final treatment acceptance and format initially presented. All estimates are based on multiple imputation.

From: Communicating effectiveness of intervention for chronic diseases: what single format can replace comprehensive information?

  

Concordance

Difference

  

OR (Crude)

OR (Adjusted*)

Beta (Crude)

Beta (Adjusted*)

Initial format

ARR

1

1

(Ref)

(Ref)

 

RRR

0.64 (0.33; 1.25)

0.62 (0.31; 1.24)

-0.41 (-0.60; -0.22)

-0.29 (-0.57; -0.02)

 

NNT

0.48 (0.25; 0.92)

0.45 (0.23; 0.87)

-0.15 (-0.34; 0.04)

0.01 (-0.28; 0.29)

 

Delay

0.57 (0.29; 1.11)

0.52 (0.26; 1.03)

0.44 (0.25; 0.63)

0.56 (0.28; 0.84)

Base line risk

Low

1

1

(Ref)

(Ref)

 

High

1.10 (0.71; 1.71)

1.07 (0.68; 1.67)

0.06 (-0.14; 0.25)

0.03 (-0.16; 0.23)

Effect size

Low

1

1

(Ref)

(Ref)

 

High

1.74 (1.12; 2.71)

1.76 (1.12; 2.77)

-0.00 (-0.20; 0.19)

0.01 (-0.19; 0.21)

  1. * Adjustment was made for age, gender, living with a partner, numeracy, personal experience with cardiovascular disease, experience with cardiovascular disease in the family, and interviewer's assessment of whether the informant understood the information given.