Skip to main content

Table 5 Association between concordance or difference of initial and final treatment acceptance and format initially presented. All estimates are based on multiple imputation.

From: Communicating effectiveness of intervention for chronic diseases: what single format can replace comprehensive information?

   Concordance Difference
   OR (Crude) OR (Adjusted*) Beta (Crude) Beta (Adjusted*)
Initial format ARR 1 1 (Ref) (Ref)
  RRR 0.64 (0.33; 1.25) 0.62 (0.31; 1.24) -0.41 (-0.60; -0.22) -0.29 (-0.57; -0.02)
  NNT 0.48 (0.25; 0.92) 0.45 (0.23; 0.87) -0.15 (-0.34; 0.04) 0.01 (-0.28; 0.29)
  Delay 0.57 (0.29; 1.11) 0.52 (0.26; 1.03) 0.44 (0.25; 0.63) 0.56 (0.28; 0.84)
Base line risk Low 1 1 (Ref) (Ref)
  High 1.10 (0.71; 1.71) 1.07 (0.68; 1.67) 0.06 (-0.14; 0.25) 0.03 (-0.16; 0.23)
Effect size Low 1 1 (Ref) (Ref)
  High 1.74 (1.12; 2.71) 1.76 (1.12; 2.77) -0.00 (-0.20; 0.19) 0.01 (-0.19; 0.21)
  1. * Adjustment was made for age, gender, living with a partner, numeracy, personal experience with cardiovascular disease, experience with cardiovascular disease in the family, and interviewer's assessment of whether the informant understood the information given.