Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The interpretation of systematic reviews with meta-analyses: an objective or subjective process?

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Oct 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alex Sutton
23 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Malinee Laopaiboon
24 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tom Trikalinos
21 Dec 2007 Author responded Author comments - Ian Shrier
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Dec 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tom Trikalinos
18 Mar 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alex Sutton
27 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Ian Shrier
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
13 May 2008 Author responded Author comments - Ian Shrier
Resubmission - Version 6
13 May 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 6
19 May 2008 Author responded Author comments - Ian Shrier
Resubmission - Version 7
19 May 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
21 May 2008 Editorially accepted
21 May 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-8-19

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement