Open Peer Review Reports for: Script Concordance Tests: Guidelines for Construction
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
28 Nov 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
28 Nov 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Bernard Charlin |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
28 Nov 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
3 Jan 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charles Sneiderman |
4 Jan 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Clarence Kreiter |
18 Feb 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jose Arocha |
17 Mar 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Bernard Charlin |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
17 Mar 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
1 Apr 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Clarence Kreiter |
16 Apr 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Bernard Charlin |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
16 Apr 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
24 Apr 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Bernard Charlin |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
24 Apr 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
28 Apr 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Bernard Charlin |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
28 Apr 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
6 May 2008 | Editorially accepted | |
6 May 2008 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-8-18 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.