Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Group differences in physician responses to handheld presentation of clinical evidence: a verbal protocol analysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Dec 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Feb 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Johanna Westbrook
16 Feb 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Chen
5 Apr 2007 Author responded Author comments - Danielle Lottridge
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Apr 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Chen
2 Jul 2007 Author responded Author comments - Danielle Lottridge
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Jul 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Jul 2007 Author responded Author comments - Danielle Lottridge
Resubmission - Version 5
21 Jul 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
26 Jul 2007 Editorially accepted
26 Jul 2007 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-7-22

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement