Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Feb 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Mar 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Enrico Coiera
7 Mar 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pamela Royle
14 Mar 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ann McKibbon
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Apr 2007 Author responded Author comments - Paul Fontelo
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Apr 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ann McKibbon
3 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pamela Royle
11 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Enrico Coiera
25 May 2007 Author responded Author comments - Paul Fontelo
Resubmission - Version 4
25 May 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 May 2007 Author responded Author comments - Paul Fontelo
Resubmission - Version 5
26 May 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 5
11 Jun 2007 Author responded Author comments - Paul Fontelo
Resubmission - Version 6
11 Jun 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
15 Jun 2007 Editorially accepted
15 Jun 2007 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-7-16

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement