Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of chi square analyses comparing CIAP users and non-users who had heard of CIAP

From: Ambulance officers' use of online clinical evidence

Questions and responses

CIAP users

CIAP non-users

Total

Please rate your computer skills

Poor/fair

16 (20.2%)

25 (49.0%)

41 (31.5%)

Good

28 (35.4%)

18 (35.3%)

46 (35.4%)

Very good/excellent

35 (44.3%)

8 (15.7%)

43 (33.1%)

χ2 = 15.80, df 2, p = 0.000

How did you first hear about CIAP?

CIAP representative/presentation

13 (16.4%)

1 (2.0%)

14 (10.8%)

Written information

7 (8.9%)

16 (31.4%)

23 (17.7%)

Work colleague

32 (40.5%)

19 (37.2%)

51 (39.2%)

Staff orientation

10 (12.7%)

7 (13.7%)

17 (13.1%)

Librarian/university

7 (8.9%)

0 (0.0%)

7 (5.4%)

Other

10 (12.7%)

8 (15.7%)

18 (13.8%)

χ2 = 19.76, df 5, p = 0.001

Indicate your support for: I think using CIAP is a legitimate part of my clinical role

Strongly disagree/disagree

3 (4.1%)

7 (15.9%)

10 (8.5%)

Undecided

13 (17.8%)

19 (43.2%)

32 (27.3%)

Agree/strongly agree

57 (78.1%)

18 (40.9%)

75 (64.1%)

χ2 = 16.85, df 2, p = 0.000

Indicate your support for: My direct supervisor thinks that using CIAP is a legitimate part of my clinical role

Strongly disagree/disagree

21 (30.0%)

12 (27.3%)

33 (28.9%)

Undecided

18 (25.7%)

23 (52.3%)

41 (36.0%)

Agree/strongly agree

31 (44.3%)

9 (20.4%)

40 (35.1%)

χ2 = 9.74, df 2, p = 0.008