Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Use of and attitudes to a hospital information system by medical secretaries, nurses and physicians deprived of the paper-based medical record: a case report

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Sep 2003 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Oct 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shaun Treweek
16 Oct 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dean Sittig
29 Feb 2004 Author responded Author comments - Hallvard Lærum
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Feb 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Mar 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shaun Treweek
26 Apr 2004 Author responded Author comments - Hallvard Lærum
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Apr 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Jun 2004 Author responded Author comments - Hallvard Lærum
Resubmission - Version 5
16 Jun 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
16 Oct 2004 Editorially accepted
16 Oct 2004 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-4-18

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement