Skip to main content

Table 5 Local and global weights of evaluation sub-criteria in DEMATEL-ANP method (CR ≤ 0.1).

From: A contrast between DEMATEL-ANP and ANP methods for six sigma project selection: a case study in healthcare industry

Cluster

GW

LW

Benefit (RW = 0,25)

 

Cash flow (S1)

0,02414

0,09655

Quality level (S2)

0,02812

0,11248

Efficiency (S3)

0,02741

0,10965

User satisfaction (S4)

0,02345

0,09382

Reduction of operational cost(S5)

0,02187

0,0875

Opportunity (RW = 0,25)

 

Operational performance (S6)

0,0356

0,14241

Market share increase (S7)

0,0212

0,08482

User loyalty (S8)

0,0321

0,12841

Employees´ performance (S9)

0,03609

0,14436

Cost (RW = 0,25)

 

Training (S10)

0,0289

0,11562

Human resources(S11)

0,05471

0,21883

Associated costs(S12)

0,04139

0,16555

Risk (RW = 0,25)

 

Technical risks(S13)

0,04029

0,16116

Delay risk(S14)

0,0396

0,1584

Cost overrun(S15)

0,04511

0,18044