Skip to main content

Table 5 Local and global weights of evaluation sub-criteria in DEMATEL-ANP method (CR ≤ 0.1).

From: A contrast between DEMATEL-ANP and ANP methods for six sigma project selection: a case study in healthcare industry

Cluster GW LW
Benefit (RW = 0,25)  
Cash flow (S1) 0,02414 0,09655
Quality level (S2) 0,02812 0,11248
Efficiency (S3) 0,02741 0,10965
User satisfaction (S4) 0,02345 0,09382
Reduction of operational cost(S5) 0,02187 0,0875
Opportunity (RW = 0,25)  
Operational performance (S6) 0,0356 0,14241
Market share increase (S7) 0,0212 0,08482
User loyalty (S8) 0,0321 0,12841
Employees´ performance (S9) 0,03609 0,14436
Cost (RW = 0,25)  
Training (S10) 0,0289 0,11562
Human resources(S11) 0,05471 0,21883
Associated costs(S12) 0,04139 0,16555
Risk (RW = 0,25)  
Technical risks(S13) 0,04029 0,16116
Delay risk(S14) 0,0396 0,1584
Cost overrun(S15) 0,04511 0,18044