Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of different methods developed and evaluated on the PhenoCHF training and test sets, respectively.

From: Using text mining techniques to extract phenotypic information from the PhenoCHF corpus

 

Discharge summaries

Articles

 

Exact Match

Relaxed Match

Exact Match

Relaxed Match

Methods

P

R

F

P

R

F

P

R

F

P

R

F

Dictionary (MetaMap)

0.22

0.29

0.25

0.39

0.51

0.44

0.42

0.25

0.30

0.67

0.33

0.44

Rules

0.88

0.86

0.87

0.92

0.93

0.92

0.83

0.88

0.85

0.88

0.90

0.89

MEMMs

0.67

0.33

0.52

0.87

0.60

0.54

0.18

0.55

0.24

0.20

0.56

0.28

HMMs

0.90

0.63

0.74

0.90

0.65

0.76

0.30

0.55

0.39

0.32

0.58

0.41

CRFs

0.88

0.77

0.82

0.90

0.86

0.88

0.48

0.62

0.54

0.53

0.69

0.60

  1. For MEMMs, HMMs and CRFs, only the results from the model with the best performing combination of features are presented (P=precision, R=recall, F=F-score).