Skip to main content

Table 6 The Refined CMOC’s

From: Stroke patients’ utilisation of extrinsic feedback from computer-based technology in the home: a multiple case study realistic evaluation

CMOC’s Plausible mechanisms: ‘what’ Contexts: ‘for whom’ and ‘in what circumstances’ Possible outcomes
CMOC 1 M1: Receiving rewarding, KR feedback from the system might improve the user’s confidence by confirming performance. C1: A system that: O1: Adoption and development of a self-management approach to rehabilitation (behaviour change).
Is reliable, accurate and robust.
Can be adapted and personalised to the individual personal, environmental and social context of the stroke survivor - Independent rehabilitation, self-evaluation and self-monitoring of recovery.
• Is accessible in the home setting
• Is used by the stroke survivor who does not believe they will become more socially isolated as a result of carrying out rehabilitation and subsequent ADL’s,
• Can be used independently of the therapist.
CMOC 2 M2: By receiving KR and KP feedback, users might feel confident to be able to interpret their performance and changing their movements to improve subsequent performance(s). C2: A system that: O2: Development of self-management skills.
Is reliable, accurate and - Problem-solving.
robust.
Can be adapted and personalised to the individual personal, environmental and social context of the stroke survivor
• Can be used independently by the stroke survivor in the home.
  Is provided in an environment where the user is provided with adequate resources and support.