Skip to main content

Table 6 The Refined CMOC’s

From: Stroke patients’ utilisation of extrinsic feedback from computer-based technology in the home: a multiple case study realistic evaluation

CMOC’s

Plausible mechanisms: ‘what’

Contexts: ‘for whom’ and ‘in what circumstances’

Possible outcomes

CMOC 1

M1: Receiving rewarding, KR feedback from the system might improve the user’s confidence by confirming performance.

C1: A system that:

O1: Adoption and development of a self-management approach to rehabilitation (behaviour change).

Is reliable, accurate and robust.

Can be adapted and personalised to the individual personal, environmental and social context of the stroke survivor

- Independent rehabilitation, self-evaluation and self-monitoring of recovery.

• Is accessible in the home setting

• Is used by the stroke survivor who does not believe they will become more socially isolated as a result of carrying out rehabilitation and subsequent ADL’s,

• Can be used independently of the therapist.

CMOC 2

M2: By receiving KR and KP feedback, users might feel confident to be able to interpret their performance and changing their movements to improve subsequent performance(s).

C2: A system that:

O2: Development of self-management skills.

Is reliable, accurate and

- Problem-solving.

robust.

Can be adapted and personalised to the individual personal, environmental and social context of the stroke survivor

• Can be used independently by the stroke survivor in the home.

  

Is provided in an environment where the user is provided with adequate resources and support.