Theory Topic 1: The theoretical approach to post-stroke rehabilitation incorporated within the SMART system.
|
Underpinning Theories: Neuroplasticity; Motor-learning
|
Independent practice
|
Used in the absence of a therapist.
|
Intensity
|
Increased rehabilitation activity.
|
Problem solving
|
Self-monitoring, self-interpretation, overcoming problems encountered in the absence of a therapist.
|
Goal setting
|
Choosing which exercises to perform.
|
Specificity
|
Matched movement patterns.
|
Repetition
|
Increased rehabilitation activity.
|
Salience
|
Relevant (meaningful) feedback.
|
Motor learning
|
The SMART system provides an opportunity to learn implicitly and explicitly through trial and error and explicit feedback.
|
Theory Topic 2: Feedback in Post-Stroke Rehabilitation.
|
Underpinning Theories: Motivation; Operant Conditioning; Motor-learning
|
Feedback content
|
The SMART system provides KP, KR, verbal and visual feedback. It also provides prescriptive feedback (in part).
|
Feedback schedule
|
The SMART system provides feedback concurrently, terminally, after each performance and in summary.
|
Rewards
|
The SMART system provides the user with the rewards of good performance through a red, amber, green chart and through scores (depending on exercise).
|
Theoretical Outcome: Behaviour change and Self-management.
|
Underpinning Theories: Self-regulation, Social cognition, and goal-setting theories; Self-efficacy.
|
Goal-setting
|
The user is able to set specific, measurable, realistic, and time specified goals (targets) to achieve that are confirmed by the computer feedback.
|
Action planning
|
The user can choose when to use the system and how many sets/repetitions they do.
|
Self-monitoring
|
The user is able to monitor performance(s) independently.
|
Reinforcement
|
The SMART system provides the user with positive feedback (depending on performance). Others are able to observe results.
|
Self-management
|
The SMART system provides the user with an opportunity to problem-solve, make decisions, utilise resources, collaborate with others, and take action depending on their interpretation of the feedback provided.
|
| |
Self-efficacy
|
The SMART system provides the user with an opportunity to evaluate achievement(s), observe demonstrations (the avatar), interpret performance(s) and changes in physical and emotional feelings as a result of usage, and receive feedback which may include verbal persuasion from significant others.
|