Table 1 Ten studies reporting respondents’ ratings of the balance of a patient decision aid
From: Balancing the presentation of information and options in patient decision aids: an updated review
Author, Year, Citation | Sample size* | Respondents who reported the PtDA was balanced. n (%) | Did the PtDA include side-by-side display of evidence? | Did the PtDA include any side-by-side display? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathieu, Barratt et al., 2010 [14] | 117 | 66 (57%) | no | no |
Smith, Trevena et al., 2010 [15] | 334 | 160 (48%) | no | no |
Griffith, Fichter et al., 2008 [6] | 106 | 17 (16%) | unclear | unclear |
Spunt, Deyo et al., 1996 [16] | 239 | 133 (56%) | unclear | unclear |
Anderson, Carter et al., 2011 [17] | 19 | 17 (89%) | no | yes |
Watson, Hewitson et al., 2006 [18] | 468 | 439 (94%) | no | yes |
Drake, Engler-Todd et al., 1999 [19] | 38 | 27 (71%) | yes | yes |
Lalonde, O’Connor et al., 2004 [20] | 16 | 13 (80%) | yes | yes |
van Tol-Geerdink, Stalmeier et al., 2006 [21] | 150 | 142 (95%) | yes | yes |
van Tol-Geerdink, Leer et al., submitted [22] | 153 | 147 (96%) | yes | yes |