This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Differentiating innovation priorities among stakeholder in hospital care
© Lambooij and Hummel; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 28 January 2013
Accepted: 12 August 2013
Published: 16 August 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|28 Jan 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|19 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stan Kachnowski|
|8 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nicola Shaw|
|12 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kathleen Gray|
|23 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Mattijs Lambooij|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nicola Shaw|
|12 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kathleen Gray|
|16 Jul 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Mattijs Lambooij|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Jul 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Aug 2013||Editorially accepted|
|16 Aug 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-13-91|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.