Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of ISO 25012 standard analysis

From: Analysis of the quality of hospital information systems audit trails

  Dimension Institutions
   D C B E
   RIS PACS VEPR EPR EPR PACS RIS
1 Completeness        
1.1 Percentage of existing essential fields 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 75% 50%
1.2 Completeness (i.e. without missing values) of sent data 66% 20% 40% 96% 34% 32% 31%
2 Consistency        
2.1 Percentage of actions after logout --- --- 1.6% --- --- --- ---
2.2 Percentage of fields filled differently in similar situations NA NA 4.34% NA NA 14.2% NA
3 Comprehensibility        
3.1 Is the information structured? NO NO YES YES YES NO NO
3.2 Number of fields with intuitive name /Number of fields 46% 46% 83% 83% 100% 64% 46%
4 Traceability        
4.1 Is there a special functionality to know who accessed logs? NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
5 Accessibility        
5.1 There is a restricted access to logs with user and password? YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
5.2 Are logs easy to query? NO NO YES YES YES NO NO
6 Credibility        
6.1 Duration of Sessions (average) --- --- 10 m1 --- --- --- ---
6.2 Is there a user profile? --- --- YES --- YES --- ---
7 Accuracy        
7.1 Is the DATE format coherent? YES YES YES NO YES --- YES
7.2 Can we distinguish the time zone? (Summer/Winter) NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
8 Precision        
8.2 Are the seconds of the actions recorded? YES YES YES SOMETIMES YES YES YES
8.3 Are the milliseconds of the actions recorded? NO NO NO NO YES NO NO
9 Recoverability        
9.1 Are there backups? --- --- YES --- --- --- ---
  1. 1 – When the timeout happens; NA: Not applicable, – Unknown.