Table 4 Results of ISO 25012 standard analysis
From: Analysis of the quality of hospital information systems audit trails
Dimension | Institutions | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D | C | B | E | |||||
RIS | PACS | VEPR | EPR | EPR | PACS | RIS | ||
1 | Completeness | |||||||
1.1 | Percentage of existing essential fields | 100% | 50% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 75% | 50% |
1.2 | Completeness (i.e. without missing values) of sent data | 66% | 20% | 40% | 96% | 34% | 32% | 31% |
2 | Consistency | |||||||
2.1 | Percentage of actions after logout | --- | --- | 1.6% | --- | --- | --- | --- |
2.2 | Percentage of fields filled differently in similar situations | NA | NA | 4.34% | NA | NA | 14.2% | NA |
3 | Comprehensibility | |||||||
3.1 | Is the information structured? | NO | NO | YES | YES | YES | NO | NO |
3.2 | Number of fields with intuitive name /Number of fields | 46% | 46% | 83% | 83% | 100% | 64% | 46% |
4 | Traceability | |||||||
4.1 | Is there a special functionality to know who accessed logs? | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO |
5 | Accessibility | |||||||
5.1 | There is a restricted access to logs with user and password? | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
5.2 | Are logs easy to query? | NO | NO | YES | YES | YES | NO | NO |
6 | Credibility | |||||||
6.1 | Duration of Sessions (average) | --- | --- | 10 m1 | --- | --- | --- | --- |
6.2 | Is there a user profile? | --- | --- | YES | --- | YES | --- | --- |
7 | Accuracy | |||||||
7.1 | Is the DATE format coherent? | YES | YES | YES | NO | YES | --- | YES |
7.2 | Can we distinguish the time zone? (Summer/Winter) | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO |
8 | Precision | |||||||
8.2 | Are the seconds of the actions recorded? | YES | YES | YES | SOMETIMES | YES | YES | YES |
8.3 | Are the milliseconds of the actions recorded? | NO | NO | NO | NO | YES | NO | NO |
9 | Recoverability | |||||||
9.1 | Are there backups? | --- | --- | YES | --- | --- | --- | --- |