Skip to main content

Table 5 Mean scores of physicians’ perceptions of the paper-based (“paper”) and computer-based (“IT”) interventions (five-point-scale: 1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree)

From: Comparative evaluation of different medication safety measures for the emergency department: physicians’ usage and acceptance of training, poster, checklist and computerized decision support

 

Physician

  

Construct

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Mean

SD

PUpaper

2.67

4.40

--

2.80

4.40

1.60

4.60

4.80

3.61

1.240

    PUIT

2.67

5.00

4.20

4.80

5.00

4.40

4.60

4.80

4.43

0.767

PEOUpaper

2.00

3.00

--

4.50

3.75

2.00

4.75

3.50

3.36

1.098

    PEOUIT

2.00

5.00

4.00

3.00

3.75

4.00

2.50

2.75

3.38

0.982

SNPaper

.

3.00

--

5.00

5.00

.

4.00

1.00

3.60

1.673

    SNIT

.

4.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

.

4.00

1.00

4.00

1.549

IMpaper

.

2.50

--

3.00

2.50

3.00

3.00

3.00

2.83

0.258

    IMIT

.

3.50

3.50

3.00

2.50

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.07

0.345

JRpaper

4.50

3.00

--

4.00

4.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

4.36

0.748

    JRIT

4.50

5.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

4.56

0.496

OQpaper

.

3.00

--

3.00

.

5.00

3.00

5.00

3.80

1.095

    OQIT

.

5.00

3.00

5.00

.

5.00

3.00

5.00

4.33

1.033

RDpaper

3.00

3.25

--

3.00

4.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

3.61

0.762

    RDIT

3.00

4.50

3.50

4.25

4.00

5.00

4.00

5.00

4.16

0.694

COMpaper

2.00

2.00

--

2.00

4.00

1.00

4.00

3.00

2.57

1.134

    COMIT

2.00

5.00

3.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

2.00

3.50

1.069

¬RTCpaper

4.00

4.50

--

.

4.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

4.58

0.492

    ¬RTCIT

4.00

4.50

3.00

.

4.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

4.36

0.784

VOpaper

5.00

5.00

--

5.00

3.00

5.00

5.00

4.00

4.57

0.787

    VOIT

5.00

5.00

4.00

5.00

3.00

5.00

5.00

2.00

4.25

1.165

ITUpaper

2.50

4.00

--

5.00

.

1.00

5.00

.

3.50

1.732

    ITUIT

2.50

5.00

4.00

5.00

.

5.00

5.00

.

4.42

1.021

  1. All values non-significant in the exact Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Meaning of abbreviations: PU, perceived usefulness; PEOU perceived ease-of-use; SN subjective norm; IM image; JR job relevance; OQ output quality; RD result demonstrability; COM compatibility; RTC resistance to change; VO voluntariness; ITU intention to use.
  2. Notes: “¬RTC” = values of RTC were reverse coded; “.” = could not be calculated because of missing values; “--“= interventions were not used.