Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Effects of a computerized feedback intervention on safety performance by junior doctors: results from a randomized mixed method study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Sep 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melissa Baysari
4 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sarah Ross
12 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brian Quilliam
23 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Illing
26 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Isabelle Colombet
17 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Sabi Redwood
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melissa Baysari
7 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brian Quilliam
17 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Illing
21 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Isabelle Colombet
28 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Sabi Redwood
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melissa Baysari
3 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Illing
7 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Isabelle Colombet
23 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Sabi Redwood
Resubmission - Version 4
23 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
29 May 2013 Editorially accepted
4 Jun 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-13-63

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement