Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Oct 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ellen M Mikkelsen
26 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karthik Ghosh
28 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carmel Apicella
16 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Lidewij Henneman
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
31 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Lidewij Henneman
Resubmission - Version 6
31 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 6
8 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carmel Apicella
14 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ellen M Mikkelsen
15 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Lidewij Henneman
Resubmission - Version 7
15 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 7
9 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ellen M Mikkelsen
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
22 Apr 2013 Editorially accepted
29 Apr 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-13-55

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement