Skip to main content

Table 2 Trends in clinical interventions and resource intensity over time, by facility type (CCC and LTC), Ontario

From: An evaluation of data quality in Canada’s Continuing Care Reporting System (CCRS): secondary analyses of Ontario data submitted between 1996 and 2011

 

Mean therapy minutes

2+ Nursing rehabilitation procedures 6+ days/week

Mean 2004 case mix index*

Mean current case mix index

Receipt of any occupational therapy

Receipt of any Physical Therapy

3+ Days rehabilitation & 45+ minutes/week

5+ Days rehabilitation & 150+ minutes/week

Special rehabilitation RUG-III level

Number of assessments

Quarter

CCC

LTC

CCC

LTC

CCC

LTC

CCC

LTC

CCC

LTC

CCC PT

LTC PT

CCC

LTC

CCC

LTC

CCC

LTC

CCC

LTC

1996_3

66.0

 

26.8%

 

0.89

 

0.99

 

23.9%

 

37.4%

 

29.7%

 

12.8%

 

19.2%

 

9,164

NA

1996_4

64.3

 

28.2%

 

0.89

 

1.00

 

23.7%

 

38.1%

 

29.8%

 

12.5%

 

19.3%

 

8,604

NA

1997_1

65.6

 

28.5%

 

0.89

 

1.00

 

23.1%

 

38.3%

 

30.2%

 

13.0%

 

19.2%

 

8,372

NA

1997_2

75.8

 

29.5%

 

0.90

 

1.00

 

25.7%

 

39.6%

 

32.5%

 

15.0%

 

21.9%

 

7,776

NA

1997_3

72.2

 

29.6%

 

0.90

 

1.00

 

26.4%

 

41.2%

 

33.5%

 

15.0%

 

21.8%

 

8,199

NA

1997_4

75.2

 

32.8%

 

0.91

 

1.01

 

29.2%

 

41.6%

 

34.8%

 

15.3%

 

23.2%

 

8,067

NA

1998_1

80.7

 

33.5%

 

0.92

 

1.02

 

31.2%

 

44.3%

 

36.7%

 

16.6%

 

24.5%

 

8,103

NA

1998_2

81.8

 

35.1%

 

0.92

 

1.02

 

31.1%

 

44.9%

 

36.9%

 

16.7%

 

25.4%

 

7,913

NA

1998_3

80.8

 

34.5%

 

0.92

 

1.02

 

29.1%

 

44.7%

 

36.4%

 

16.4%

 

25.0%

 

7,855

NA

1998_4

80.2

 

33.9%

 

0.92

 

1.03

 

29.0%

 

45.5%

 

36.8%

 

16.7%

 

24.5%

 

8,024

NA

1999_1

89.8

 

35.6%

 

0.92

 

1.03

 

30.3%

 

46.3%

 

37.1%

 

16.5%

 

24.8%

 

7,977

NA

1999_2

80.2

 

35.2%

 

0.92

 

1.02

 

30.3%

 

46.6%

 

36.2%

 

16.0%

 

24.7%

 

7,887

NA

1999_3

80.0

 

35.3%

 

0.93

 

1.03

 

31.2%

 

47.3%

 

37.4%

 

17.0%

 

25.6%

 

7,798

NA

1999_4

82.2

 

37.3%

 

0.93

 

1.04

 

32.1%

 

47.9%

 

38.3%

 

16.7%

 

26.2%

 

7,883

NA

2000_1

86.2

 

39.2%

 

0.94

 

1.05

 

35.3%

 

48.4%

 

39.9%

 

18.4%

 

27.9%

 

7,899

NA

2000_2

84.0

 

39.6%

 

0.95

 

1.06

 

34.5%

 

50.0%

 

40.6%

 

18.4%

 

28.6%

 

7,840

NA

2000_3

87.2

 

40.3%

 

0.95

 

1.05

 

33.2%

 

47.5%

 

38.9%

 

17.5%

 

27.8%

 

7,795

NA

2000_4

87.6

 

41.9%

 

0.95

 

1.05

 

34.5%

 

49.2%

 

40.0%

 

17.8%

 

28.3%

 

7,607

NA

2001_1

85.2

 

42.3%

 

0.96

 

1.07

 

35.9%

 

49.2%

 

40.5%

 

18.1%

 

29.1%

 

7,908

NA

2001_2

88.0

 

49.3%

 

0.97

 

1.08

 

36.6%

 

48.8%

 

40.8%

 

18.0%

 

30.8%

 

7,903

NA

2001_3

85.4

 

53.8%

 

0.97

 

1.08

 

35.4%

 

49.3%

 

40.4%

 

17.7%

 

31.4%

 

7,850

NA

2001_4

85.7

 

57.8%

 

0.99

 

1.10

 

35.9%

 

51.7%

 

42.2%

 

18.5%

 

33.7%

 

8,020

NA

2002_1

88.6

 

61.4%

 

0.99

 

1.10

 

36.6%

 

53.4%

 

44.1%

 

19.3%

 

36.1%

 

7,909

NA

2002_2

98.8

 

64.4%

 

1.00

 

1.11

 

38.5%

 

53.8%

 

45.1%

 

20.3%

 

37.6%

 

7,640

NA

2002_3

96.4

 

63.9%

 

1.00

 

1.11

 

36.7%

 

53.2%

 

44.1%

 

20.7%

 

37.2%

 

7,718

NA

2002_4

96.9

 

64.7%

 

1.00

 

1.11

 

39.6%

 

55.2%

 

45.9%

 

20.6%

 

38.0%

 

7,732

NA

2003_1

97.3

 

65.7%

 

1.01

 

1.13

 

40.0%

 

55.5%

 

45.6%

 

21.0%

 

39.1%

 

7,572

NA

2003_2

100.2

 

65.9%

 

1.01

 

1.04

 

40.6%

 

55.7%

 

46.4%

 

21.6%

 

39.9%

 

7,431

NA

2003_3

95.8

 

65.2%

 

1.00

 

1.03

 

39.7%

 

56.2%

 

46.1%

 

20.5%

 

39.1%

 

7,535

NA

2003_4

98.9

 

64.9%

 

1.01

 

1.04

 

42.5%

 

56.8%

 

47.8%

 

22.1%

 

40.9%

 

7,748

NA

2004_1

106.4

 

64.9%

 

1.01

 

1.05

 

43.4%

 

58.9%

 

50.3%

 

24.1%

 

43.4%

 

7,724

NA

2004_2

108.6

 

65.2%

 

1.02

 

1.03

 

44.8%

 

60.6%

 

51.3%

 

24.6%

 

44.2%

 

7,662

NA

2004_3

110.3

 

66.0%

 

1.02

 

1.02

 

45.3%

 

59.7%

 

51.0%

 

25.3%

 

44.2%

 

7,745

NA

2004_4

110.7

 

64.1%

 

1.02

 

1.03

 

46.3%

 

60.9%

 

51.2%

 

25.3%

 

44.0%

 

7,718

NA

2005_1

112.1

 

65.7%

 

1.02

 

1.03

 

46.3%

 

60.7%

 

51.6%

 

25.9%

 

44.9%

 

7,792

NA

2005_2

117.8

 

66.7%

 

1.03

 

1.03

 

48.2%

 

62.7%

 

53.3%

 

27.5%

 

46.3%

 

7,612

NA

2005_3

118.8

14.8

66.9%

23.1%

1.03

0.70

1.04

0.70

51.8%

2.3%

63.6%

32.1%

54.7%

13.0%

28.4%

0.2%

47.9%

2.4%

7,438

1,373

2005_4

116.1

10.3

66.2%

14.1%

1.03

0.68

1.03

0.68

52.4%

1.4%

62.9%

23.3%

54.4%

9.9%

27.4%

0.3%

47.7%

1.8%

7,519

2,699

2006_1

119.4

10.2

66.3%

12.9%

1.04

0.68

1.04

0.68

53.1%

1.5%

64.5%

21.9%

55.5%

8.9%

28.9%

0.3%

48.8%

1.5%

7,476

2,906

2006_2

121.6

19.2

68.5%

9.4%

1.04

0.68

1.03

0.67

53.5%

3.2%

64.6%

35.5%

55.7%

16.5%

28.5%

0.4%

49.5%

1.6%

7,435

5,825

2006_3

117.2

22.9

67.9%

8.3%

1.04

0.69

1.03

0.67

50.8%

2.6%

63.7%

41.7%

53.7%

19.3%

27.8%

0.5%

47.9%

2.1%

7,164

13,428

2006_4

119.0

22.7

68.6%

9.3%

1.04

0.69

1.03

0.68

52.9%

3.2%

63.9%

43.7%

54.7%

17.4%

28.2%

0.6%

48.6%

2.5%

7,149

13,589

2007_1

114.7

24.7

67.9%

11.5%

1.04

0.69

1.03

0.68

51.2%

2.9%

63.3%

45.6%

53.8%

17.0%

27.0%

0.4%

48.0%

2.8%

7,241

13,538

2007_2

120.1

24.6

68.4%

14.6%

1.05

0.70

1.02

0.67

52.7%

3.1%

65.0%

47.8%

55.5%

18.8%

28.3%

0.6%

48.9%

4.0%

7,190

14,337

2007_3

118.6

25.2

69.9%

15.1%

1.04

0.69

1.01

0.67

52.6%

2.5%

64.0%

49.1%

55.1%

19.5%

27.9%

0.8%

49.0%

4.9%

7,077

18,231

2007_4

121.4

25.2

69.1%

15.5%

1.05

0.69

1.01

0.66

53.6%

2.0%

65.2%

49.6%

55.9%

19.9%

29.4%

0.8%

49.4%

4.9%

7,231

21,999

2008_1

119.5

25.0

69.0%

15.0%

1.05

0.69

1.02

0.66

54.2%

2.0%

65.0%

49.2%

56.6%

20.9%

29.5%

0.9%

49.8%

5.0%

7,137

22,307

2008_2

122.4

26.0

68.6%

13.9%

1.05

0.69

1.01

0.65

53.5%

2.4%

66.2%

50.5%

57.4%

22.6%

30.8%

0.9%

50.5%

5.2%

7,097

28,323

2008_3

117.4

27.3

69.2%

13.5%

1.04

0.69

1.00

0.65

53.8%

3.0%

65.9%

54.3%

56.9%

24.5%

28.7%

0.8%

49.9%

5.4%

6,898

30,750

2008_4

124.6

27.6

67.2%

13.9%

1.05

0.69

1.01

0.65

56.2%

3.3%

68.2%

55.2%

59.1%

25.6%

31.5%

1.1%

51.5%

6.5%

7,038

31,373

2009_1

127.2

28.5

66.9%

14.6%

1.06

0.70

1.01

0.66

56.6%

3.3%

68.2%

57.4%

59.5%

27.8%

32.5%

1.2%

51.6%

7.2%

6,928

31,305

2009_2

128.5

31.3

68.1%

13.8%

1.05

0.70

1.00

0.66

57.1%

3.0%

68.6%

61.6%

60.0%

31.1%

32.0%

1.1%

51.9%

7.4%

7,124

40,454

2009_3

122.2

33.3

69.6%

13.3%

1.05

0.70

1.00

0.66

55.1%

2.8%

67.3%

64.9%

58.6%

35.8%

30.9%

1.2%

51.3%

8.0%

6,947

61,281

2009_4

123.2

35.6

69.0%

16.4%

1.04

0.72

1.00

0.67

54.4%

2.8%

66.9%

68.7%

58.6%

41.8%

30.0%

1.3%

50.6%

11.2%

7,192

74,405

2010_1

127.9

38.1

68.8%

22.2%

1.05

0.73

1.00

0.69

55.9%

3.5%

69.1%

73.1%

60.6%

49.4%

31.5%

1.2%

52.4%

15.7%

7,026

77,427

2010_2

133.4

40.6

67.6%

25.6%

1.05

0.75

1.00

0.70

57.5%

3.7%

69.6%

77.5%

61.8%

56.7%

32.4%

1.3%

53.5%

19.8%

6,954

77,554

2010_3

130.7

41.0

68.3%

27.7%

1.04

0.75

0.99

0.71

56.6%

3.4%

69.9%

79.2%

61.3%

59.1%

31.5%

1.2%

52.7%

21.9%

6,979

78,103

2010_4

137.6

41.8

67.4%

28.2%

1.05

0.76

1.00

0.71

57.1%

3.5%

71.1%

80.1%

61.9%

61.9%

33.9%

1.2%

54.1%

22.6%

7,032

78,497

2011_1

142.0

42.4

64.3%

26.7%

1.06

0.76

1.01

0.71

58.5%

3.3%

71.5%

81.1%

63.2%

63.2%

34.8%

1.3%

54.1%

21.4%

6,943

78,255

Intercept

67.5

11.9

32.0%

9.5%

0.90

0.67

1.05

0.66

23.9%

2.1%

39.4%

24.2%

30.8%

1.3%

12.3%

0.2%

19.4%

-3.1%

Slope

1.17

1.32

0.79%

0.58%

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.63%

0.06%

0.57%

2.49%

0.56%

2.36%

0.37%

0.05%

0.65%

0.93%

  1. * For comparability with previous analyses, the CMI was recalculated using 2004 values.