Skip to main content

Table 10 Trends in assessments with indicators of possible auto-population over time, by facility type (CCC and LTC), Ontario

From: An evaluation of data quality in Canada’s Continuing Care Reporting System (CCRS): secondary analyses of Ontario data submitted between 1996 and 2011

  All 231 clinical quarterly variables same at reassessment* All 16 mood items same at reassessment** All 20 ADL performance and support items same at reassessment* Number of assessments
Quarter CCC LTC CCC LTC CCC LTC CCC LTC
1996_3 0.7%   34.8%   34.2%   3,853 NA
1996_4 2.2%   35.3%   36.0%   3,600 NA
1997_1 1.4%   32.2%   33.5%   3,213 NA
1997_2 1.1%   26.4%   29.8%   3,184 NA
1997_3 1.0%   32.7%   34.4%   3,331 NA
1997_4 1.7%   36.7%   39.1%   3,329 NA
1998_2 1.2%   36.8%   38.9%   3,292 NA
1998_3 1.0%   33.6%   34.9%   3,290 NA
1998_4 0.9%   34.2%   36.1%   3,259 NA
1999_1 0.7%   38.1%   41.4%   3,131 NA
1999_2 1.1%   38.0%   41.4%   3,172 NA
1999_3 0.9%   35.4%   37.7%   3,242 NA
1999_4 1.0%   37.1%   39.2%   3,138 NA
2000_1 1.0%   35.8%   37.6%   3,104 NA
2000_2 0.5%   35.8%   37.8%   3,080 NA
2000_3 0.9%   34.6%   38.7%   3,133 NA
2000_4 1.2%   35.4%   38.3%   2,961 NA
2001_1 1.3%   35.3%   37.9%   2,915 NA
2001_2 1.3%   33.2%   35.4%   2,965 NA
2001_3 1.2%   34.4%   37.8%   3,059 NA
2001_4 0.4%   35.9%   38.2%   3,103 NA
2002_1 0.7%   35.7%   37.4%   3,168 NA
2002_2 0.3%   35.5%   38.1%   3,030 NA
2002_3 0.5%   36.9%   37.6%   3,041 NA
2002_4 0.5%   38.2%   39.5%   3,042 NA
2003_1 0.4%   41.5%   39.8%   2,931 NA
2003_2 0.4%   31.2%   33.5%   2,808 NA
2003_3 1.0%   36.8%   38.2%   2,726 NA
2003_4 2.4%   41.5%   45.1%   2,720 NA
2004_1 1.7%   43.1%   45.9%   2,715 NA
2004_2 1.1%   42.5%   44.6%   2,722 NA
2004_3 0.8%   44.4%   45.4%   2,738 NA
2004_4 1.1%   45.8%   45.5%   2,657 NA
2005_1 0.7%   46.0%   47.5%   2,631 NA
2005_2 0.7%   44.8%   45.9%   2,552 NA
2005_3 0.8%   43.3%   44.9%   2,503 NA
2005_4 0.6% 0.5% 45.8% 28.6% 49.0% 39.3% 2,500 880
2006_1 0.4% 0.0% 43.7% 15.4% 44.4% 26.0% 2,461 1,941
2006_2 0.6% 0.2% 47.0% 16.6% 48.1% 28.3% 2,478 1,960
2006_3 0.7% 0.2% 48.6% 20.0% 51.2% 31.2% 2,541 4,209
2006_4 0.6% 0.3% 47.7% 19.3% 51.2% 30.5% 2,516 9,708
2007_1 0.7% 0.3% 50.0% 18.9% 52.5% 29.8% 2,480 9,699
2007_2 0.9% 0.2% 50.0% 18.8% 53.0% 30.1% 2,457 9,732
2007_3 0.6% 0.1% 50.6% 20.4% 51.5% 32.4% 2,483 10,262
2007_4 2.0% 0.1% 46.4% 22.0% 49.8% 32.5% 2,500 12,887
2008_1 1.2% 0.2% 47.2% 22.4% 48.8% 33.9% 2,479 15,044
2008_2 1.6% 0.1% 47.7% 24.9% 49.6% 35.0% 2,404 15,056
2008_3 0.9% 0.1% 48.6% 25.5% 48.5% 34.9% 2,469 19,116
2008_4 0.7% 0.2% 48.1% 26.1% 51.2% 34.4% 2,424 20,291
2009_1 0.3% 0.2% 48.8% 26.9% 49.3% 36.1% 2,394 20,075
2009_2 1.2% 0.2% 48.1% 28.2% 50.1% 36.3% 2,302 19,721
2009_3 0.7% 0.1% 48.0% 24.7% 48.9% 31.2% 2,282 26,965
2009_4 0.6% 0.1% 46.6% 20.6% 49.0% 25.9% 2,288 42,271
2010_1 0.5% 0.1% 44.2% 19.7% 46.6% 24.6% 2,237 51,059
2010_2 0.4% 0.1% 45.5% 20.5% 46.0% 24.8% 2,250 52,614
2010_3 0.5% 0.0% 46.6% 20.8% 44.5% 24.6% 2,243 52,750
2010_4 0.8% 0.0% 48.3% 21.1% 48.2% 24.6% 2,105 52,064
2011_1 0.6% 0.0% 46.7% 20.8% 48.6% 23.5% 2,021 51,771
Intercept 0.5% 0.3% 31.6% 20.7% 33.8% 34.2% – –
Slope -0.01% -0.01% 0.32% 0.11% 0.31% -0.33% – –
  1. *excluding comatose.
  2. **excluding comatose and those with 0’s.
Back to article page