Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparing the results before and after the SMS intervention

From: Effects of and satisfaction with short message service reminders for patient medication adherence: a randomized controlled study

 

Variable

Before SMS intervention

After SMS intervention

Improvement

P-value

  

N

%

N

%

%

 
       

< .001a

Intervention group

Delayed doses (Total)

646

84.7c

137

18.0c

78.8

< .001b

  20 ~ 34 y/o

146

90.1

32

19.8

78.1

 

  35 ~ 49 y/o

181

79.7

52

22.9

71.3

 

  50 ~ 64 y/o

196

85.6

35

15.2

82.2

 

   65 y/o

123

84.8

18

12.4

85.4

 

Control group

Delayed doses (Total)

349

80.2c

187

43.0c

46.4

< .001b

  20 ~ 34 y/o

83

86.5

58

60.4

30.1

 

  35 ~ 49 y/o

105

77.8

62

45.9

41.0

 

  50 ~ 64 y/o

113

77.4

54

37.0

52.2

 

   65 y/o

48

82.8

13

22.4

72.9

 

Intervention group

Missed doses (Total)

352

46.1c

35

4.6c

90.1

< .001b

  20 ~ 34 y/o

90

55.6

9

5.6

90.0

 

  35 ~ 49 y/o

97

42.7

9

4.0

90.7

 

  50 ~ 64 y/o

101

44.1

10

4.4

90.0

 

   65 y/o

64

44.1

7

4.8

89.1

 

Control group

Missed doses (Total)

190

43.7c

74

17.0c

61.1

< .001b

  20 ~ 34 y/o

52

54.2

28

29.2

46.2

 

  35 ~ 49 y/o

62

45.9

14

10.4

77.4

 

  50 ~ 64 y/o

52

35.6

30

20.6

42.3

 

   65 y/o

24

41.4

2

3.5

91.7

 
  1. a: used chi-square test to examine the difference between groups; b: Used the McNemar’s test to examine the difference between the pre-test and post-test data within the group. c: intervention group% = n/763; control group%=n/435.