Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Measuring decision quality: psychometric evaluation of a new instrument for breast cancer surgery

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Oct 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - Karen Sepucha
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brenda Den Oudsten
16 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jennifer Kryworuchko
20 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Karen Sepucha
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brenda Den Oudsten
5 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jennifer Kryworuchko
23 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Karen Sepucha
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
21 May 2012 Editorially accepted
8 Jun 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-12-51

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement