Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Reaching consensus on the physiotherapeutic management of patients following upper abdominal surgery: a pragmatic approach to interpret equivocal evidence

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Jun 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nerys Frances Woolacott
24 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - valerie lawrence
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nerys Frances Woolacott
15 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - valerie lawrence
12 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Susan Hanekom
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nerys Frances Woolacott
15 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Susan Hanekom
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Susan Hanekom
Resubmission - Version 5
26 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
30 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Susan Hanekom
Resubmission - Version 6
30 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
31 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Susan Hanekom
Resubmission - Version 8
31 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
6 Feb 2012 Editorially accepted
6 Feb 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-12-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement