Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of model selection in terms of spatial recall

From: Spatial cluster detection using dynamic programming

Frequency range

Coverage

DP recall

GR recall

SR recall

(DP-GR) 95% confidenceinterval limits

p-value

Low

< 16%

0.08729

0.09759

0.04993

- 0.01031

- 0.01029

< 0.00001

 

16-34%

0.13665

0.14801

0.10795

- 0.01137

- 0.01135

< 0.00001

 

≥ 35%

0.18579

0.19636

0.17592

- 0.01060

- 0.01055

< 0.00001

Mid

< 16%

0.39280

0.38533

0.11793

0.00745

0.00749

< 0.00001

 

16-34%

0.56118

0.55025

0.24091

0.01092

0.01095

< 0.00001

 

≥ 35%

0.74869

0.75813

0.42978

- 0.00956

- 0.00932

< 0.00001

High

< 16%

0.62454

0.60666

0.13601

0.01786

0.01789

< 0.00001

 

16-34%

0.82999

0.82147

0.29433

0.00850

0.00852

< 0.00001

 

≥ 35%

0.91850

0.91130

0.50550

0.00716

0.00724

< 0.00001

Very high

< 16%

0.93248

0.92970

0.24123

0.00277

0.00278

< 0.00001

 

16-34%

0.99829

0.99809

0.62275

0.00020

0.00020

< 0.00001

 

≥ 35%

0.99813

0.99815

0.74743

- 0.00002

- 0.00001

< 0.00001

  1. Comparison of the DP, GR, and SR spatial recall obtained from model selection. The table shows the mean recall for each algorithm, the lower and upper 95% confidence limits for the difference in recall (DP-GR) and the associated t-test p-values