Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 6 Results of structural equation modeling

From: Motivating medical information system performance by system quality, service quality, and job satisfaction for evidence-based practice

Path Path name Path coefficient t Value
System quality (ξ1)→ Service quality (η1) ( H1 ) γ11 0.55 6.40*
System quality (ξ1)→ Job satisfaction (η2) ( H2 ) γ21 0.32 3.11*
System quality (ξ1)→ System performance (η3) ( H3 ) γ31 0.47 5.56*
Service quality (η1)→ System performance (η3) ( H4 ) β31 0.38 3.65*
Job satisfaction (η2)→ System performance (η3) ( H5 ) β32 0.46 5.26*
System quality (ξ1)→ Security (x1) λ1 0.053 1.07
System quality (ξ1)→ Ease of use (x 2) λ2 0.65 7.83*
System quality (ξ1)→ Efficiency (x3) λ3 0.41 4.33*
Service Quality (η1)→ Reliability (y1) λ4 0.031 0.79
Service Quality (η1)→ Responsiveness (y 2) λ5 0.60 7.22*
System performance (η3)→ Work performance (y 3) λ6 0.59 7.03*
System performance (η3)→ Work commitment (y 4) λ7 0.46 5.22*
Goodness of fit χ 2/d.f.= 2.39, GFI = .92, AGFI = .87, NFI = .92, RMSR = .056.
  1. * p < .05.