Skip to main content

Table 1 Physician consensus

From: Users’ perspectives of key factors to implementing electronic health records in Canada: a Delphi study

Strength of consensus

EHR implementation factor

Criteria§ A = applicability I = importance

Consensus* (Agreement in %)

5-point Likert score

Percentile score

Inter- quartile range

10th

25th

Strong

Confidence in EHR developer or vendor

A

≥ 75 %

4

2

4

0

I

≥ 75 %

4

4

4

0

Moderate

Cost issues (start-up and maintenance)

A

≥ 75 %

4

3

4

0

I

60-74 %

4

3

4

0

Lack of time and workload (clinical tasks)

A

60-74 %

4

3

4

0

I

60-74 %

4

4

4

1

Partial

Cost issues (return on investment)

A

60-74 %

4

1

2

2

I

< 60 %

1

3

1

Patient and health professional interaction

A

< 60 %

3

3

1

I

60-74 %

4

3

3

1

Lack of time and workload (EHR use)

A

60-74 %

4

2

4

0

I

< 60 %

4

4

1

Change in tasks

A

60-74 %

4

3

4

0

I

< 60 %

3

4

1

Choice of the EHR system

A

60-74 %

4

2

3

1

I

< 60 %

2

3

1

None

Design and technical concerns

A

< 60 %

3

3

2

I

< 60 %

3

3

2

Privacy and security concerns (patient privacy)

A

< 60 %

1

2

2

I

< 60 %

1

2

2

Privacy and security concerns (professional confidentiality)

A

< 60 %

1

1

3

I

< 60 %

1

3

2

Quality standards

A

< 60 %

3

3

2

I

< 60 %

3

3

2

Productivity (loss of)

A

< 60 %

3

3

2

I

< 60 %

3

4

1

Practice size (small)

A

< 60 %

2

2

2

I

< 60 %

2

3

2

Practice size (large)

A

< 60 %

3

3

2

I

< 60 %

3

3

2

Physician salary status and reimbursement

A

< 60 %

2

2

2

I

< 60 %

2

3

1

Human resources (IT support, other)

A

< 60 %

1

3

2

I

< 60 %

3

4

1

Management

A

< 60 %

1

2

1

I

< 60 %

2

2

1

  1. § A = applicability, I = importance.
  2. * Agreement in %: ≥ 75 % agreement, 60-74 % agreement, < 60 % agreement.