Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Prescriber and staff perceptions of an electronic prescribing system in primary care: a qualitative assessment

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Jun 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Emily Beth Devine
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Georgiou
21 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jos Aarts
4 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Emily Beth Devine
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Georgiou
28 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jos Aarts
3 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Emily Beth Devine
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
13 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Emily Beth Devine
Resubmission - Version 5
13 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
19 Nov 2010 Editorially accepted
19 Nov 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-10-72

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement