A knowledge-based taxonomy of critical factors for adopting electronic health record systems by physicians: a systematic literature review
© Castillo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 4 June 2010
Accepted: 15 October 2010
Published: 15 October 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|4 Jun 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|24 Jul 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ashish Jha|
|24 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pirkko Nykänen|
|23 Sep 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Víctor H. Castillo|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Sep 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|14 Oct 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Víctor H. Castillo|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|14 Oct 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|15 Oct 2010||Editorially accepted|
|15 Oct 2010||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-10-60|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.